Decision, Disagreement & Consensus BoardSAMPLEReady
Sample report with illustrative demo values. Not a real study, customer or market claim.
Download PDFOpen StoryOpen DeckAppendix

Decision, Disagreement & Consensus Board

MEMO
To
SAMPLE / EXEMPLU
From
SKP analysis desk
Re
SAMPLE subject: three pricing offers for a design-review service
Date
28/09/2026

Directional verdict: A leads, C polarizes, B is priced out.

Not market validation. Not observed behavior. A structured synthetic read of where relevant personas may prefer, reject, misunderstand or disagree.

DecisionBridge to action: test A’s clarified wording with live traffic.

Executive summary

  • Variant A (€49 one-off) had the lowest average objection score in this SAMPLE run.
  • Variant B triggered strong price resistance across budget-sensitive personas.
  • Variant C split the panel: subscription fatigue versus low entry price.

Scoring model

Comprehension is checked first as a disqualifying gate. Eligible options are summarized with median + range, a forced best-worst tally, segment cuts and polarization; disagreement is reported rather than averaged away.

Use case

Choosing which offer to put in front of real traffic first.

Next step

Move the strongest variant into a live SKPTST behavior test.

Confidence: Low — Synthetic panel. Directional read of objections, not a forecast of demand.

The SKP suite
Adversarial research

Research designed to disagree with you.

Explore SKPSIS
Synthetic decision panel

Where ideas meet resistance.

This report
Observe real behavior

Test behavior, not opinions.

Logical next step →Explore SKPTST